World’s First Liquid-Fueled Rocket Launch – A Century Later

by Dave Nordling, RRS.ORG

A century ago, on March 16, 1926, on a snowy field at the Ward farm in Auburn, Massachusetts, an experimental device built by a Clark University physics professor, Robert Hutchings Goddard, made history being the first liquid-fueled rocket to fly. Powered by gasoline and liquefied oxygen, the humble craft flew a modest 41 feet in altitude and 184 feet downrange after a few initial unsuccessful attempts. From this first flight to the start of the American involvement in the second world war in 1941, him and his team made a total of 34 pioneering flights. It wasn’t until after the second world war that his achievements were more fully appreciated and recognized earning him the title of the Father of Modern Rocketry.

Goddard’s early university research with black powder rockets, vacuum hot-fire tests and the use of a de Laval nozzle produced a small rocket engine far more efficient that it’s predecessors in the 1920’s. His seminal work, A Method for Reaching Extreme Altitudes, first published in 1919 by the Smithsonian Press, was pivotal. Goddard recognized that lighter structures would result in higher final velocities and recognized the value of staging to reaching higher overall altitudes by shedding dead weight along the flight. His work also recognized the value of two-axis gyroscopic stabilization as a means to achieve straighter and more accurate flights. Higher temperatures and better combustion efficiency possible with liquid fuels would make for smaller combustion chambers. Goddard’s notes indicated hydrogen and oxygen having the highest combustion efficiency, but in his first flight, the use of a common and relatively well understood hydrocarbon fuel such as automotive gasoline was likely a reasonable choice. He conducted experiments with gasoline and oxygen combustion starting in 1921 and had a working engine by 1923.

The physical arrangement of Goddard’s first liquid rocket, named “Nell”, was unusual by what is considered common practice today. The combustion chamber with a very long shallow-angle nozzle was at the top with the propellant tanks at the bottom, thus the engine was pulling itself up with the tanks trailing behind. It was thought this arrangement would be more stable in flight. The injection and mixing of propellants in a chamber ahead of a converging path leading to the constriction of the throat area was a major advancement. Owing to conservatism to avoid flow separation of the expected supersonic flow in the downstream diverging portion of the nozzle, the half-angle was very small as was common for the early experiments prior to more detailed knowledge of nozzle geometry. The liquefied oxygen tank sat above the gasoline tank. Wisely, the oxygen tank had a relief valve and a conical hat on top of the oxidizer likely to better divide the exhaust flow. The hot exhaust from the nozzle impinging down on the oxidizer tank would heat the liquid oxygen creating more gas flow to the chamber. His design sought to pressurize the propellants to help feed them by separate fuel and oxidizer lines upward into the combustion chamber. The burning of alcohol-soaked rags surrounding the oxygen tank were used to improve the oxygen gas flow to the combustion chamber. Needle valves in the line offered some ability to balance the relative flow rates into the chamber. The igniter used in the first liquid rocket flight was a closed charge of match heads and black powder that was externally heated by a blow torch on a long pole held by an assistant, Henry Sachs, to achieve ignition and flight. Clark University digital archival documents may have some better descriptions of how operations took place.

“[022] Assistant (Henry Sachs) igniting the rocket, March 16, 1926” by Esther C. Goddard

Later designs as seen in photographs would put the engine at the bottom and tanks forward with tapered nose shapes and care paid to achieving lower aerodynamic drag, higher exhaust velocities and of course higher mass fractions for greater delta-V.

One of the more common questions asked about this 1926 flight was where Dr. Goddard acquired his liquid oxygen. Most likely he acquired it through a commercial supplier, likely what is known today as the Linde Air Products Company. The first Linde plant in the US, an American subsidiary company of the German company, Linde AG, was located in Buffalo, New York, and offered liquid oxygen in 1907. Today, Linde PLC exists from the 2018 merger of the original Linde AG company and Praxair. The details of his handling and loading procedures for the liquid oxygen is something that the society is seeking to discover purely for historical context.

Owing to public ridicule and widespread fundamental misunderstandings of his work, Goddard became very reclusive and many of his achievements were only recognized in the latter years of his life and after his death. Many were inspired by his 1919 monograph, but very quickly uninformed speculation by others led to absurd assertions leading others to deride the young scientist’s work. Most infamously the New York Times claiming “rockets would never work in the vacuum of space” and Goddard was “lacking the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools” only to be serving a post-humous retraction and apology to Goddard 24 years after his death coinciding with the American moon landing in 1969.

Despite some success with the US Army in making portable artillery rockets and an early version of the bazooka, Goddard was very guarded about his work owing to concerns about his inventions being stolen by others including potential funding from companies despite several patent filings. He did much of his later work in relative secrecy in Roswell, New Mexico. Interest in rocketry in the US prior to the second world war was also very modest in contrast to the German government at the time seeking an alternative to traditional guns and artillery pieces limited by armistice agreements at that time. Goddard managed to secure modest funding from a variety of sources throughout the years including the Smithsonian, aviation clubs, the Guggenheim family and famous aviator, Charles Lindbergh, but the amounts considered quite large at the time by researchers were paltry compared to the state funding the Germans secured in the years leading up the second world war. Several groups over the years took note of Goddard’s work but collaboration was slight if not absent.

German rocketry in the 1930’s certainly took notice of Goddard’s work and advanced the science significantly in the years leading to the world’s first ballistic missile, the V-2 (named the A-4 by the Germans). Von Braun and his team took careful notice of Goddard’s work saying Goddard’s work “blazed the trail” for his team to make rapid advancements in Germany. Goddard’s aspirations, like many of the other pioneers of his time including Von Braun, were concerned with space travel starting with exploring and measuring the upper atmosphere. An anecdote I once heard was that when Von Braun was brought to the United States, he was initially surprised how little work was done here, quipping “after all, you had Robert Goddard?” It’s not clear if this anecdote or quote is actually true, but I found it amusing to hear.

After nations realized the potentially devastating effect the V-2 rocket had in the second world war, rocketry and ballistic missiles would become a game-changing technology in late 20th century warfare garnering massive investments in money and materials. Resulting from lessons of the second world war ending in 1945, the ballistic missile era would begin in the early days of the Cold War that follows and in parallel with the founding of NASA and the Space Age in the United States and similarly with the allied nations of Europe and in the Soviet Union. The initial Space Age would lead to further achievements such as the Soviet Union putting the first satellite in full orbit (1958), the first man in orbit (1961), and later the first woman in orbit (1963), followed by lunar probe soft landings (1966) and just 11 years later after Sputnik the first two of twelve American men landing on the moon in six different missions by the United States starting in 1969. Robert Goddard’s work in liquid rocketry being recognized as the seed that would enable the technology making all of this possible.

While some honors and recognition were bestowed on Goddard before his death in 1945, his contribution to science became more widely appreciated in the years and decades thereafter. The NASA facility, Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, bears his name.

Two quotes from Goddard are given below which are something that I found to be particularly relevant even today in the early 21st century:

It is difficult to say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today and the reality of tomorrow. Just remember – when you think all is lost, the future remains. The reason people fail is not for lack of vision but for lack of resolve and resolve is born out of counting the cost.

Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized it becomes commonplace.

It’s worth noting that Estes Rockets launched a special hobby rocket kit replicating the initial Goddard rocket design for about $32 USD. This could be a little celebratory fun at the RRS MTA at our next event.

Robert Goddard Model Rocket Kit | Estes Rockets

The RRS honors Robert Goddard in this modest but exemplary achievement in human history. The society was glad to see many well written articles throughout the internet, including one on LinkedIn, honoring this century milestone on Monday, March 16, 2026. This article posted today represents the society’s tribute to one of the most consequential experiments leading to the dawn of the Space Age.

For more information on the Reaction Research Society, please visit our website at RRS.ORG or contact the RRS president by email at: president@rrs.org

Also, the RRS would like to advertise our 83rd anniversary symposium to be held Saturday, April 18, 2026, at the Mary Star of the Sea High School in San Pedro, California. This all-day event will have speakers and exhibits related to amateur and professional rocketry. More information will be posted and can be found by contacting the RRS.


MTA Firing Report, 2025-11-01

by Dave Nordling, Pyrotechnic Operator, RRS.ORG

The Reaction Research Society (RRS) held a liquid-fueled static fire event of the UCLA Rocket Project’s latest designs at the Mojave Test Area (MTA) on Saturday, November 1, 2025. We also had a member project that day with Austin Sennott and Charles Sharp launching three versions of their Half-Cat design.

The weather was quite good all day with very low winds and mild temperatures. The teams seemed well prepared and briefed me on their operations prior to commencing propellant operations. RRS member, Bill Nelson, assisted me in overseeing the event as my apprentice.

UCLA’s first static firing had a no-start condition on their igniter due to an open circuit which was easily corrected, but the team opened the run valves dumping the alcohol and liquid oxygen. For safety, the team ran the tanks until empty and simply waited to let the reminder of the liquid left in the horizontal internal space of the engine evaporate. UCLA would correct their operational mistakes on the next run.

While the UCLA engine was drying and the system rendered safe, the Half-Cat team got the next operation and conducted fuel filling and remote nitrous oxide filling. The Half-Cat design has flown nearly a hundred times at both the RRS MTA and FAR. They had three successful launches one right after the other. All vehicles were recovered with only one recovery system getting tangled. The HalfCats flown that day were gasoline and nitrous oxide which was loaded by a remote controlled system from the Garboden bunker.

UCLA returned to their static-fire operations after the HalfCat team was complete. They corrected the problem with the igniter and replaced the engine. The second run was a little more successful.

The UCLA team is testing the latest iteration of their ethanol (75% with water) and liquid oxygen impingement injector. It has an ablative liner running the whole chamber length to a graphite converging-diverging nozzle plug. An aluminum shell provides structural strength holding the assembly together. Ignition of the engine is by a nozzle-mounted pyrotechnic igniter (model rocket motor) held in place by an external clamp. The system has worked well in recent iterations.

Firing operations on this second attempt proceeded as planned with a clean, steady burn. Unfortunately, near the end of the run, the engine experienced burn-through and the chamber ruptured upstream of the nozzle in the upward location. Operations concluded safely and after a cooldown period, the engine was inspected. The data suggested the chamber pressure and mixture ratio was higher than predicted, but the ablation of the liner seemed relatively even circumferentially. The G10 plastic liner was thought to be able to last longer. Some concern was raised about variability in the product used today versus that used in the past. The failure was relatively benign and adjustments to the propellant feed should correct the issue.

The UCLA team intends to fly their next vehicle for the FAR-MARS competition at the end of the Spring Quarter 2026. The single engine tests are necessary steps in selecting the right design for the best outcome. Although the sun was getting low, UCLA requested a third test with their next engine prototype. The team worked quickly to install their last engine of that day.

The team finished the installation, verified no leakage and began fuel and oxidizer fill operations. Remote pressurization operations went well and the team proceeded into the count. The second engine fire was steady and ran to completion. The pressurants were bled down and the system rendered safe. After some cooling off, the engine was inspected.

Some sparks were seen exiting the plume and some graphite ablation (small chunks popping out) at two locations around the convergent side was detected during inspections after engine removal. This is somewhat normal for some types of graphite. The UCLA throat design has a more gentle contour that can permit some of this undesirable ablation pattern without opening the throat area and decreasing performance.

The second engine firing was a success in that it could be reused. UCLA had a third design that was 3D-printed and regeneratively cooled, but no further operations were permitted that day given the late hour. The UCLA team expressed interest in returning to the MTA for another round of testing. The RRS is glad to assist university teams with their projects.

During UCLA’s last installation operation, I took the time to look at the RRS’s second 60-foot launch rail which is still under construction. The Jurassic Launcher is so named as the underlying custom-built hydraulic lift system was one of a few used 30 years ago in the 1992 movie, Jurassic Park. The RRS was glad to purchase the system and is in the process of refurbishing it for liquid rockets needing a longer run length.

The steel backbone structure was a radio tower donated to the society by RRS member, Waldo Stakes. Some welding repairs have been completed and a short extension was put at the end to give a full 60-foot run length. The backbone needs a little more of the finer work to get the rail lugs installed. There is also some work to be done replacing hoses, cleaning and rebuilding valves and the pump if needed, building structural pieces, mounting and integration of the backbone and restoring the reservoir tank. Once finished, Jurassic Launcher will be a valuable asset to members and clients at the RRS MTA

Austin and Charles gathered all three of their rockets and gathered valuable data with their prolific and growing flight history at the RRS. Several members indicated their interest in building a HalfCat or a derivative version. I was also grateful to them for their professionalism and efficiency in operations. They were a good example for the teams at the MTA.

I was also grateful to the UCLA team who similarly showed maturity and patience in their operations which led to useful results despite a few setbacks. They policed the area for their trash and loaded their equipment for departure with practiced ease.

For those groups and members wanting to use the RRS MTA, contact the RRS president, Frank Miuccio. president@rrs.org

The next monthly meeting of the RRS is every 2nd Friday at the front office of the Compton/Woodley Airport. Next one will be December 12, 2025.


MTA Firing Event, 2022-07-31

by Dave Nordling, President, Reaction Research Society


The University of Michigan came to the Mojave Test Area for another static fire campaign starting Monday, July 25th and ending July 31st. Pyrotechnic operators, Jim Gross, Osvaldo Tarditti and myself supported this protracted campaign in the July heat. The weather was challenging during that week with few heat-related problems other than slow progress which is understandable given the conditions. New RRS member, Rushd Julfiker, and long time member, Jim Gross, assisted me in the cold flow and hot-fire testing. MASA’s academic adviser, Professor Mirko Gamba was also present at the MTA for the days of cold flow and hot-fire testing.

University of Michigan held a Test Readiness Review on Sunday, 7/17/2022, with RRS members present. Many good questions were raised but few corrections were needed. MASA proceeded with packing and departed campus for the MTA on Friday, 7/22/2022.

University of Michigan first day at the Mojave Test Area

The team arrived at the MTA on Monday night (7/25/2022) and began to unpack their gear and assemble the mobile test trailer. Leak checking went more smoothly due to design improvements. Problems with the igniter channel would prove to be a recurring concern.

Initial setup of the mobile trailer at first arrival.
Attaching frequently used tools by retractable tethers means never hunting for the right wrench again. Genius.
Hewlett-Packard film crew prepares to have interviews with the students.
Control trailer operations leading up to test.
A clean injector ready to be installed.
Fuel transfer operations before next test.
230-liter cryogenic liquid cylinders from Linde.

On Friday (7/29/22), gas bottles and cryogenic liquids were recieved from the supplier. Delays in receiving these consumables allowed sufficient time to verify systems were ready. MASA achieved significant progress towards hotfire after completing four valve timing coldflows and one abort test. Analysis of the data from our tests in preparation for hotfire tomorrow.

The RP-D2 engine sits on its thrust stand.
University of Michigan’s mobile test trailer beside the vertical test stand

Saturday (7/30/22) was the first attempt at hot-fire which was unsuccessful due to an igniter failure. The cause was traced back to an intermittent problem with the switch in the junction box. The prior igniter test demonstrated the igniter would fire in the cold flow conditions the day before. Comparing data sets, the team found that a simple verification of continuity in the voltage data stream during the countdown would safely identify a failed igniter firing circuit and allow a safe abort if it were to repeat.

RRS members Jim Gross and Rushd Julfiker examine the setup before the next test attempt.

In the last hour of the last day (Sunday, 7/31/22) of the campaign, MASA completed a successful 1 second hot-fire of the 2,000 lbf RP-D2 engine. The chamber and injector remained intact and the system safed itself properly.

Screenshot from the 1-second firing of RP-D2 as seen from the Garboden bunker

After examining the data, pressures were significantly off from the expected profile, but the engine passed the visual inspection After further consideration, the team opted not to proceed with a longer 4-second burn due to the uncertainty about our data values and pressure drops seen from hot-fire. MASA would conduct a more thorough examination of the data and hardware back at the university.

The MASA team began cleaning up the test site on Sunday night and continued throughout the night to prepare for the 1800 mile jouney home. University of Michigan was extremely happy with the result of their campaign and were grateful to our pyro-op’s and membership that supported every day with the MASA team.

The RRS was glad to provide our testing site, resources, experience, labor and insight to this successful testing campaign.

For inquiries about using the RRS Mojave Test Area, contact the RRS president.

president@rrs.org